Fast forward to today, and it’s clear that hunt sabs are still the main line of defence for hunted animals, as we were before the ban. While there have been a number of successful prosecutions under the Act, the measly sentencing powers available provide little deterrence to those who routinely flout it.
But it’s without doubt that hunting is significantly weaker than it was then. While the numbers, profile and ingenuity of hunt saboteurs has blossomed, hunts have seen diminishing support, with more succumbing to sab campaigns and financial and logistical pressures, forcing dozens of hunts to disband or amalgamate.
And in the last few years, some of the biggest blows have been dealt against hunting.
The leak of online webinars attended by hunt masters from across the country in 2020, in which leaders of hunting’s governing body - the Hunting Office - laid out ways that hunts could protect themselves while breaking the law. In particular, ‘trail hunting’ was put in the spotlight after it was described as a ‘smokescreen’ - cover for illegal hunting. This resulted in some of the UK’s biggest landowners banning hunts from using their land, and more recently the Hunting Office being reinvented as the equally ineffective ‘British Hound Sports Association.’
Some of the most damning footage has been recorded and released post-ban, including exclusive footage on Channel 4 News only last month, and most of it filmed by the hunters themselves. An uptick in media attention has resulted in the truth behind the ‘trail hunt’ lie being broadcast to the front rooms of the nation, and police chiefs being (at least) more vocal about the issue and the shortcomings of the law.
WARNING: GRAPHIC IMAGE
No comments:
Post a Comment